GSOL vs. BTCC
GSOL (Grayscale Solana Staking ETF) and BTCC (Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSOL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for BTCC.
Performance
GSOL vs. BTCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GSOL
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCC
- 1D
- -3.88%
- 1M
- -18.76%
- YTD
- -25.58%
- 6M
- -25.45%
- 1Y
- -38.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSOL vs. BTCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | -17.88% |
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -17.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSOL and BTCC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSOL vs. BTCC — Risk / Return Rank
GSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTCC
GSOL vs. BTCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) and Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BTCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSOL | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSOL vs. BTCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSOL drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, smaller than the maximum BTCC drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSOL and BTCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSOL | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.60% | -44.40% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.35% | -43.08% | +23.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -16.67% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.80% | — |
Volatility
GSOL vs. BTCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSOL | BTCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.02% | 34.15% | +47.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.02% | 32.21% | +49.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.02% | 32.21% | +49.81% |
GSOL vs. BTCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSOL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCC's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSOL vs. BTCC - Dividend Comparison
GSOL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCC Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 116.36% | 63.86% |
GSOL Grayscale Solana Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSOL and BTCC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSOL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSOL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BTCC.
BTCC has the higher dividend yield at 116.36%, compared with 0.00% for GSOL.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GSOL and 0.66% for BTCC.
Find the right allocation for GSOL and BTCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer