PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSNIX vs. GCGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Bond Fund (GSNIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSNIX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than GCGIX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GSNIX has underperformed GCGIX with an annualized return of 1.89%, while GCGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.09% annualized return.


GSNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.30%
1Y
6.58%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
1.89%

GCGIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.79%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.96%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
18.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSNIX
Goldman Sachs Bond Fund
0.21%8.57%0.99%6.87%-15.75%-2.17%11.71%10.60%-1.46%3.09%
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
6.18%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%29.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GSNIX and GCGIX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

-0.08

The correlation between GSNIX and GCGIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSNIX vs. GCGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSNIX
GSNIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GSNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GSNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Bond Fund (GSNIX) and Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSNIXGCGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.44

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

4.71

+1.01

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the GCGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSNIX and GCGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSNIXGCGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.76

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.84

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.46

+0.27

Drawdowns

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSNIX drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum GCGIX drawdown of -65.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSNIX and GCGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSNIXGCGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-65.78%

+43.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.51%

-17.25%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.70%

-25.10%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.05%

-32.57%

+11.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.36%

-32.94%

+10.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-0.31%

-3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-20.82%

+16.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

5.25%

-4.10%

Volatility

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Bond Fund (GSNIX) is 1.54%, while Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that GSNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSNIXGCGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

3.25%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

11.81%

-8.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

15.66%

-11.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

22.23%

-15.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

21.55%

-16.13%

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSNIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GCGIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSNIX vs. GCGIX - Dividend Comparison

GSNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than GCGIX's 7.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.06%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GSNIX
Goldman Sachs Bond Fund
4.71%4.67%3.97%3.71%2.53%2.34%4.80%3.16%2.77%2.56%2.85%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSNIX and GCGIX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCGIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to GSNIX (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSNIX dropped -22.36% vs GCGIX's -65.78%.

GCGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSNIX and GCGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer