GSMCX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSMCX (Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSMCX returned 11.75%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for FZAMX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSMCX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSMCX achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GSMCX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.

GSMCX

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 4.61%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 11.75%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 22.92%
• 1Y: 38.64%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	13.99%	9.77%	19.33%	11.95%	-10.25%	30.75%	8.78%	32.04%	-10.53%	11.14%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.57%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMCX and FZAMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013	0.94

The correlation between GSMCX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSMCX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMCX

GSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 45
GSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSMCX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	2.35	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	3.19	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.41	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	4.12	-1.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.82	16.56	-5.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSMCX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSMCX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	2.35	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.56	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.59	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.57	-0.02

Drawdowns

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMCX drawdown since its inception was -54.35%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMCX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSMCX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.35%	-42.32%	-12.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-9.77%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	-25.24%	+5.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.03%	-25.24%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.57%	-42.32%	-0.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-6.08%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	2.43%	0.00%

Volatility

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) is 4.18%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that GSMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSMCX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	5.00%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.03%	13.74%	-2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	17.14%	-2.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	20.23%	-2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	20.94%	-0.43%

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSMCX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

GSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.85%, more than FZAMX's 5.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.80%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	12.85%	14.65%	13.86%	4.92%	13.96%	17.06%	0.69%	3.42%	18.39%	15.77%	1.49%	13.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSMCX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

GSMCX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSMCX or FZAMX?

FZAMX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to GSMCX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSMCX dropped -54.35% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.