GSMCX vs. FTSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX).
GSMCX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 1, 1995. FTSIX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Dec 26, 2018.
Performance
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.03% | 9.77% | 19.33% | 11.95% | -10.25% | 30.75% | 8.78% | 32.04% |
FTSIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund | 6.17% | 6.04% | 11.86% | 18.52% | -17.63% | 25.29% | 19.19% | 26.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSMCX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than FTSIX's 6.17% return.
GSMCX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
FTSIX
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSMCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSIX's 2.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSMCX vs. FTSIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSMCX
FTSIX
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSMCX | FTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.91 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.42 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 5.73 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSMCX | FTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.91 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.28 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.53 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSMCX and FTSIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Dividend Comparison
GSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.36%, more than FTSIX's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund | 14.36% | 14.65% | 13.86% | 4.92% | 13.96% | 17.06% | 0.69% | 3.42% | 18.39% | 15.77% | 1.49% | 13.85% |
FTSIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.95% | 5.50% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSMCX drawdown since its inception was -54.35%, which is greater than FTSIX's maximum drawdown of -42.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMCX and FTSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSMCX | FTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.35% | -42.12% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -13.29% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.03% | -27.57% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -4.50% | -2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -7.80% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.29% | -0.21% |
Volatility
GSMCX vs. FTSIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) at 5.75%. This indicates that GSMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSMCX | FTSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 5.75% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 11.27% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 20.15% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 19.14% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 23.49% | -3.03% |