PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLIX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSLIX having a 19.81% return and TILVX slightly higher at 20.09%. Over the past 10 years, GSLIX has outperformed TILVX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while TILVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.


GSLIX

1D
1.31%
1M
0.43%
6M
14.93%
YTD
19.81%
1Y
29.59%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
12.40%
ALL TIME*
8.60%

TILVX

1D
0.48%
1M
1.48%
6M
14.87%
YTD
20.09%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.31%
ALL TIME*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
19.81%10.86%30.73%13.19%-6.26%24.00%4.22%26.09%-8.64%9.80%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
20.09%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLIX and TILVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002

0.97

The correlation between GSLIX and TILVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLIX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSLIX
GSLIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GSLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSLIXTILVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.46

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.37

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

18.65

-2.53

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLIX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLIX drawdown since its inception was -53.28%, smaller than the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLIX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLIXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.28%

-60.05%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-6.80%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

-15.58%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

-19.00%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

-40.15%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.53%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-8.21%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.61%

+0.08%

Volatility

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLIXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.89%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

8.72%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

11.44%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

14.83%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

17.62%

+1.38%

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSLIX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

GSLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than TILVX's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund
12.08%14.48%23.46%6.25%9.37%12.38%3.54%5.82%13.23%16.85%2.08%10.60%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
4.96%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GSLIX and TILVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSLIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to TILVX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLIX dropped -53.28% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLIX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer