GSLIX vs. NQCRX
GSLIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GSLIX returned 12.40%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GSLIX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.
Performance
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSLIX having a 19.81% return and NQCRX slightly higher at 20.39%. Over the past 10 years, GSLIX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 12.40%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.50% annualized return.
GSLIX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 1Y
- 29.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.60%
NQCRX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- YTD
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund | 19.81% | 10.86% | 30.73% | 13.19% | -6.26% | 24.00% | 4.22% | 26.09% | -8.64% | 9.80% |
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund | 20.39% | 22.44% | 17.74% | 13.76% | -1.07% | 25.38% | -0.27% | 47.63% | -15.47% | 15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLIX and NQCRX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006 | 0.94 |
The correlation between GSLIX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLIX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank
GSLIX
NQCRX
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSLIX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 5.37 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 20.17 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLIX drawdown since its inception was -53.28%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLIX and NQCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLIX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.28% | -57.85% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -6.07% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.42% | -17.21% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -17.61% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.93% | -41.84% | +4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.30% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -9.93% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.62% | +0.07% |
Volatility
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund (GSLIX) is 2.92%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that GSLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLIX | NQCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.10% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 9.74% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 12.69% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 15.54% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 18.80% | +0.20% |
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSLIX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison
GSLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than NQCRX's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund | 12.08% | 14.48% | 23.46% | 6.25% | 9.37% | 12.38% | 3.54% | 5.82% | 13.23% | 16.85% | 2.08% | 10.60% |
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund | 6.07% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 2.22% | 4.63% | 20.85% | 17.95% | 26.88% | 34.12% | 27.42% | 10.74% | 61.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSLIX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NQCRX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to GSLIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSLIX dropped -53.28% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.
NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSLIX and NQCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer