PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSLC vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSLC vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 8.17% return.


GSLC

1D
2.88%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
-3.45%
1Y
14.87%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.77%
10Y*
13.15%

FMTM

1D
4.80%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
8.17%
6M
16.49%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSLC vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSLC vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC
GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLCFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.58

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

2.09

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

3.15

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.79

11.97

-6.17

GSLC vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC and FMTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLCFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.58

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.61

-0.87

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC and FMTM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GSLC vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than FMTM's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.06%1.00%1.11%1.38%1.61%1.06%1.35%1.54%1.89%1.69%1.69%0.36%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSLC vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC and FMTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLCFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-12.12%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-12.12%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.89%

-7.90%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-1.88%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.19%

-0.50%

Volatility

GSLC vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is 5.29%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that GSLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSLCFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

11.09%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

19.22%

-9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

23.34%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

23.18%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

23.18%

-5.51%