GSKH vs. XBI
GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return while XBI tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GSKH returned 30.78% vs 56.42% for XBI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XBI.
Performance
GSKH vs. XBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSKH achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than XBI's 5.53% return.
GSKH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 56.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
GSKH vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 7.84% | 37.05% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 5.53% | 31.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSKH and XBI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | 0.34 |
GSKH vs. XBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSKH
XBI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GSKH
XBI
Basic Materials
GSKH
-
XBI
Communication Services
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Consumer Cyclical
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Consumer Defensive
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Energy
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Financial Services
GSKH
-
XBI
Industrials
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Real Estate
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Technology
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Utilities
GSKH
-
XBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSKH vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank
GSKH
XBI
GSKH vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSKH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 5.83 | -4.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 17.50 | -13.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSKH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.19 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.36 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
GSKH vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and XBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSKH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -63.89% | +45.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | -9.72% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -25.63% | +12.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -20.93% | +15.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 3.23% | +4.38% |
Volatility
GSKH vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) is 6.33%, while SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that GSKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSKH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 9.84% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 20.47% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 25.87% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 32.23% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 32.01% | -4.93% |
GSKH vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSKH vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison
GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than XBI's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 1.57% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSKH and XBI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XBI has higher volatility (9.84%) compared to GSKH (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSKH dropped -18.54% vs XBI's -63.89%.
On 1-year performance, XBI leads with 56.42% vs 30.78% for GSKH. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GSKH has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XBI has performed better with a 56.42% return vs 30.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XBI.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.34% for XBI.
GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.35% for XBI.
XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSKH and XBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer