GSKH vs. SPAQ
GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and SPAQ (Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GSKH is passively managed, while SPAQ is actively managed. Over the past year, GSKH returned 30.78% vs 4.96% for SPAQ. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SPAQ.
Performance
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSKH achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPAQ's 2.68% return.
GSKH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAQ
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 7.84% | 37.05% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 2.68% | 7.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSKH and SPAQ is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | -0.03 |
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSKH
SPAQ
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GSKH
SPAQ
-
Basic Materials
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Communication Services
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Consumer Defensive
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Energy
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Financial Services
GSKH
-
SPAQ
Industrials
GSKH
-
SPAQ
Real Estate
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Technology
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Utilities
GSKH
-
SPAQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSKH vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSKH
SPAQ
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSKH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 0.94 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 3.38 | +0.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSKH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.57 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.86 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and SPAQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSKH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -5.30% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | -5.30% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -0.14% | -13.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -0.54% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 1.47% | +6.14% |
Volatility
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison
GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.88%. This indicates that GSKH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSKH | SPAQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 1.88% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 5.01% | +13.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 8.80% | +17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 6.99% | +20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 6.99% | +20.09% |
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSKH vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison
GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than SPAQ's 16.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 1.57% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAQ Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | 16.25% | 16.69% | 3.00% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSKH and SPAQ have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSKH has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SPAQ (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSKH dropped -18.54% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.
On 1-year performance, GSKH leads with 30.78% vs 4.96% for SPAQ. On fees, GSKH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSKH has performed better with a 30.78% return vs 4.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSKH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SPAQ.
SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.25%, compared with 1.57% for GSKH.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.85% for SPAQ.
GSKH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSKH and SPAQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer