GSKH vs. IBBQ
GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) and IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return while IBBQ tracks the NASDAQ / Biotechnology. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GSKH returned 30.78% vs 40.50% for IBBQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSKH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for IBBQ.
Performance
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSKH achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than IBBQ's 2.58% return.
GSKH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 8.19%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBBQ
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 7.84% | 37.05% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 2.58% | 30.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSKH and IBBQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | 0.47 |
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSKH
IBBQ
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GSKH
IBBQ
Basic Materials
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Communication Services
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Defensive
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Energy
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Financial Services
GSKH
-
IBBQ
Industrials
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Real Estate
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Technology
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Utilities
GSKH
-
IBBQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSKH vs. IBBQ — Risk / Return Rank
GSKH
IBBQ
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSKH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 4.88 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 15.85 | -11.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSKH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.05 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.16 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSKH drawdown since its inception was -18.54%, smaller than the maximum IBBQ drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSKH and IBBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSKH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | -37.94% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.54% | -8.34% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -4.55% | -8.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -16.80% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 2.56% | +5.05% |
Volatility
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH) is 6.33%, while Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that GSKH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBBQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSKH | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.33% | 7.12% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 15.27% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 19.83% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 21.88% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.08% | 21.88% | +5.20% |
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSKH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBBQ's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSKH vs. IBBQ - Dividend Comparison
GSKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than IBBQ's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 1.57% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.86% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSKH and IBBQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBBQ has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to GSKH (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSKH dropped -18.54% vs IBBQ's -37.94%.
On 1-year performance, IBBQ leads with 40.50% vs 30.78% for GSKH. On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GSKH has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBBQ has performed better with a 40.50% return vs 30.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for GSKH.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.86% for IBBQ.
GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return, while IBBQ tracks NASDAQ / Biotechnology. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for GSKH and 0.00% for IBBQ.
IBBQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSKH and IBBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer