GSITX vs. DLDRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSITX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund) and DLDRX (BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund) are both mutual funds - GSITX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while DLDRX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Dreyfus. Over the past 10 years, GSITX returned 13.24%/yr vs 14.27%/yr for DLDRX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSITX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for DLDRX.

Performance

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSITX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly lower than DLDRX's 27.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GSITX has underperformed DLDRX with an annualized return of 13.24%, while DLDRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.27% annualized return.

GSITX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 19.26%
• 6M: 18.44%
• 1Y: 45.14%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 13.24%

DLDRX

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 27.78%
• 6M: 30.19%
• 1Y: 54.55%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 16.44%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSITX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund	19.26%	12.95%	29.64%	17.50%	-13.56%	33.22%	0.32%	23.52%	-10.69%	7.49%
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund	27.78%	15.04%	0.81%	1.58%	34.18%	38.30%	6.58%	16.64%	-17.57%	14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GSITX and DLDRX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.70

The correlation between GSITX and DLDRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSITX vs. DLDRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSITX

GSITX Risk / Return Rank: 80
GSITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GSITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GSITX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
GSITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GSITX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DLDRX

DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 89
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSITX	DLDRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	3.11	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.96	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.51	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	7.52	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.26	23.70	-5.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSITX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the DLDRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSITX and DLDRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSITX	DLDRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	3.11	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.64	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.56	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.40	-0.01

Drawdowns

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSITX drawdown since its inception was -56.37%, smaller than the maximum DLDRX drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSITX and DLDRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSITX	DLDRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.37%	-69.13%	+12.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-7.49%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.88%	-32.44%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.88%	-32.44%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.17%	-54.24%	+7.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-20.77%	+11.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.37%	+0.23%

Volatility

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund (GSITX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) at 4.59%. This indicates that GSITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLDRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSITX	DLDRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	4.59%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	13.47%	-1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	18.14%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.67%	25.65%	-2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.12%	25.49%	-1.37%

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSITX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than DLDRX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSITX vs. DLDRX - Dividend Comparison

GSITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than DLDRX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund	1.83%	2.33%	7.45%	12.42%	9.66%	5.07%	1.11%	2.16%	1.87%	0.63%	1.44%	1.25%
GSITX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund	4.06%	4.84%	30.83%	1.37%	2.63%	26.49%	0.72%	0.71%	9.14%	9.11%	3.55%	5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSITX and DLDRX in my portfolio?

GSITX and DLDRX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSITX or DLDRX?

GSITX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to DLDRX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSITX dropped -56.37% vs DLDRX's -69.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLDRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.