PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIMX vs. GFRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIMX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than GFRIX's 1.17% return.


GSIMX

1D
-1.00%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
5.38%
6M
7.01%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*

GFRIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
5.38%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
1.17%4.07%7.44%10.49%-3.02%4.36%2.52%11.06%-1.32%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIMX and GFRIX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.24

The correlation between GSIMX and GFRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIMX vs. GFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GFRIX
GFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIMXGFRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.49

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.51

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

8.78

-3.83

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the GFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIMX and GFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIMXGFRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.63

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.49

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.13

-0.32

Drawdowns

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIMX drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, which is greater than GFRIX's maximum drawdown of -23.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIMX and GFRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIMXGFRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.84%

-23.14%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-1.62%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.32%

-3.42%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-6.70%

-18.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-0.12%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-0.90%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

0.46%

+1.89%

Volatility

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund (GFRIX) at 0.65%. This indicates that GSIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIMXGFRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

0.65%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

1.81%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

2.49%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

2.86%

+11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

4.20%

+11.49%

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than GFRIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIMX vs. GFRIX - Dividend Comparison

GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than GFRIX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFRIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Floating Rate Fund
7.07%7.15%7.63%7.13%4.79%3.41%4.19%6.77%4.73%4.00%4.18%4.12%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.86%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIMX and GFRIX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIMX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to GFRIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIMX dropped -28.84% vs GFRIX's -23.14%.

GFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIMX and GFRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer