GSIKX vs. GSMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX).
GSIKX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 24, 2007. GSMIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 19, 1993.
Performance
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund | 0.53% | 34.30% | 8.81% | 17.60% | -7.93% | 13.66% | 2.59% | 26.92% | -12.12% | 26.53% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | -0.49% | 4.12% | 3.03% | 6.41% | -9.77% | 2.80% | 3.57% | 7.49% | 2.83% | 5.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIKX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than GSMIX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIKX has outperformed GSMIX with an annualized return of 10.17%, while GSMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.
GSIKX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
GSMIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.53%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIKX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GSMIX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIKX vs. GSMIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSIKX
GSMIX
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIKX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.92 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 1.26 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 0.88 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | 3.14 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIKX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.92 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.26 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.95 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIKX and GSMIX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Dividend Comparison
GSIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than GSMIX's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund | 3.90% | 3.93% | 3.23% | 2.78% | 0.64% | 2.90% | 1.96% | 2.85% | 14.89% | 1.73% | 2.35% | 1.14% |
GSMIX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund | 3.52% | 4.32% | 3.31% | 2.82% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.11% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.99% | 3.35% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIKX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, which is greater than GSMIX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIKX and GSMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIKX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.58% | -15.43% | -41.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -4.44% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -14.33% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -14.33% | -20.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.43% | -2.39% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -2.41% | -9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.25% | +1.77% |
Volatility
GSIKX vs. GSMIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund (GSIKX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund (GSMIX) at 0.88%. This indicates that GSIKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIKX | GSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 0.88% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 1.46% | +9.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 4.48% | +11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 3.64% | +10.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 3.90% | +12.16% |