GSIFX vs. GUIRX
GSIFX (Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A) and GUIRX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class) are both mutual funds - GSIFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GUIRX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX returned 9.42%/yr vs 2.78%/yr for GUIRX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. GSIFX charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for GUIRX.
Performance
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has outperformed GUIRX with an annualized return of 9.42%, while GUIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
GUIRX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 6.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 6.83% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 1.70% | 4.73% | 3.66% | 6.37% | -9.66% | 3.11% | 3.86% | 7.80% | 3.09% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIFX and GUIRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011 | -0.00 |
The correlation between GSIFX and GUIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIFX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank
GSIFX
GUIRX
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIFX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.70 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.66 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 9.33 | -5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIFX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.70 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.10 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, which is greater than GUIRX's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and GUIRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIFX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.25% | -14.21% | -45.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -2.46% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.83% | -5.33% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -14.16% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -14.21% | -20.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.22% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -2.12% | -13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 0.70% | +2.48% |
Volatility
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that GSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIFX | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 0.91% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 1.83% | +10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 2.44% | +13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 3.70% | +13.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 3.94% | +13.46% |
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison
GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than GUIRX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.04% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 3.74% | 4.90% | 3.86% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIFX and GUIRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSIFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to GUIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIFX dropped -59.25% vs GUIRX's -14.21%.
GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIFX and GUIRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer