PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIFX vs. GUIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has outperformed GUIRX with an annualized return of 9.42%, while GUIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.78% annualized return.


GSIFX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.77%
YTD
6.83%
6M
9.07%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.42%

GUIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.83%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.70%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%7.80%3.09%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIFX and GUIRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

-0.00

The correlation between GSIFX and GUIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIFX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIFXGUIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.70

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.66

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

9.33

-5.09

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GUIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIFX and GUIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIFXGUIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.70

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.36

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

1.10

-0.78

Drawdowns

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, which is greater than GUIRX's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and GUIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIFXGUIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.25%

-14.21%

-45.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-2.46%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-5.33%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-14.16%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-14.21%

-20.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.22%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-2.12%

-13.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

0.70%

+2.48%

Volatility

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that GSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIFXGUIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

0.91%

+3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

1.83%

+10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

2.44%

+13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

3.70%

+13.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

3.94%

+13.46%

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIFX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison

GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than GUIRX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.04%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIFX and GUIRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to GUIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIFX dropped -59.25% vs GUIRX's -14.21%.

GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIFX and GUIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer