PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIFX vs. GSPKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than GSPKX's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has underperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


GSIFX

1D
2.61%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.04%
YTD
7.83%
1Y
17.32%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.64%
ALL TIME*
5.85%

GSPKX

1D
1.32%
1M
-0.10%
6M
8.75%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.64%
ALL TIME*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
7.83%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.37%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIFX and GSPKX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.77

The correlation between GSIFX and GSPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIFX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIFXGSPKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.37

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

11.61

-6.55

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the GSPKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIFX and GSPKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, which is greater than GSPKX's maximum drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and GSPKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIFXGSPKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.25%

-51.90%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-7.83%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-20.51%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-22.34%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-32.70%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.24%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.16%

-5.95%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

1.60%

+1.55%

Volatility

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) at 2.76%. This indicates that GSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIFXGSPKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

2.76%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

8.46%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

10.54%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

16.07%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

16.88%

+0.24%

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIFX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison

GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than GSPKX's 6.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.02%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
6.00%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIFX and GSPKX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to GSPKX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIFX dropped -59.25% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.

GSPKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIFX and GSPKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer