GSIFX vs. GLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX).
GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992. GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013.
Performance
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.94% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIFX achieves a -5.52% return, which is significantly lower than GLPIX's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, GSIFX has underperformed GLPIX with an annualized return of 8.34%, while GLPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
GLPIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 22.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIFX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIFX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GSIFX
GLPIX
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIFX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.87 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 1.18 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.96 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.23 | 2.41 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIFX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.87 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 1.20 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.19 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIFX and GLPIX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison
GSIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GLPIX's 6.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.21% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIFX drawdown since its inception was -59.25%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIFX and GLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIFX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.25% | -75.98% | +16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.15% | -13.62% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -20.89% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -70.48% | +35.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -1.00% | -10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -23.44% | +8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 5.41% | -2.35% |
Volatility
GSIFX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) at 3.17%. This indicates that GSIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIFX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 3.17% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 7.52% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 15.45% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 19.22% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 26.09% | -8.77% |