PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGRX vs. TILVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGRX achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than TILVX's 14.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSGRX having a 11.38% annualized return and TILVX not far behind at 11.10%.


GSGRX

1D
0.92%
1M
4.77%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.72%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
11.38%

TILVX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.30%
6M
14.82%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
12.62%12.48%25.98%8.19%-5.28%21.83%3.49%24.98%-6.11%10.37%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
14.30%15.81%14.26%11.49%-7.57%25.05%2.90%26.48%-8.38%10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGRX and TILVX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.97

The correlation between GSGRX and TILVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGRX vs. TILVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGRX
GSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TILVX
TILVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TILVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TILVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGRXTILVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

4.30

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

18.01

-1.04

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the TILVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGRX and TILVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGRXTILVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.70

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.71

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.63

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Drawdowns

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, smaller than the maximum TILVX drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGRX and TILVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGRXTILVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-60.05%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-6.80%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-15.58%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.02%

-19.00%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.11%

-40.15%

+5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-8.26%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

1.62%

-0.19%

Volatility

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund (TILVX) have volatilities of 2.90% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGRXTILVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.04%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

8.19%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.17%

10.84%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

14.82%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.66%

-0.47%

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TILVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGRX vs. TILVX - Dividend Comparison

GSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than TILVX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
8.93%9.72%18.35%4.70%4.42%8.01%1.52%5.56%2.67%1.69%1.79%1.90%
TILVX
TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Value Index Fund
5.21%5.96%3.04%4.90%4.57%3.77%2.26%7.05%4.68%2.01%3.14%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GSGRX and TILVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TILVX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to GSGRX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGRX dropped -54.44% vs TILVX's -60.05%.

TILVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGRX and TILVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer