PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGRX vs. ADVGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and North Square Advisory Research Small Cap Value Fund (ADVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGRX achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly lower than ADVGX's 24.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGRX has underperformed ADVGX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while ADVGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


GSGRX

1D
0.40%
1M
1.60%
6M
14.42%
YTD
14.42%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
11.50%

ADVGX

1D
-0.48%
1M
12.08%
6M
24.89%
YTD
24.89%
1Y
30.68%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
14.42%12.48%25.98%8.19%-5.28%21.83%3.49%24.98%-6.11%10.37%
ADVGX
North Square Advisory Research Small Cap Value Fund
24.89%7.13%15.52%20.90%-12.98%29.94%-2.61%27.64%-3.27%19.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGRX and ADVGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between GSGRX and ADVGX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGRX vs. ADVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGRX
GSGRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GSGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ADVGX
ADVGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ADVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) and North Square Advisory Research Small Cap Value Fund (ADVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSGRXADVGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

2.22

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

5.91

+9.02

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the ADVGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGRX and ADVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGRX drawdown since its inception was -54.44%, which is greater than ADVGX's maximum drawdown of -41.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGRX and ADVGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGRXADVGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-41.34%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-14.92%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-27.69%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.02%

-27.69%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.11%

-41.34%

+6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.48%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-5.54%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

5.59%

-4.16%

Volatility

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) is 3.16%, while North Square Advisory Research Small Cap Value Fund (ADVGX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that GSGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGRXADVGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

5.31%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

14.37%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

19.50%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

21.55%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

21.06%

-3.94%

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGRX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ADVGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGRX vs. ADVGX - Dividend Comparison

GSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, more than ADVGX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVGX
North Square Advisory Research Small Cap Value Fund
4.55%5.68%1.16%0.85%6.87%7.52%11.47%11.43%41.46%9.66%7.34%19.79%
GSGRX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund
8.73%9.72%18.35%4.70%4.42%8.01%1.52%5.56%2.67%1.69%1.79%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGRX and ADVGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADVGX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to GSGRX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGRX dropped -54.44% vs ADVGX's -41.34%.

GSGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGRX and ADVGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer