PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSG vs. BRCYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSG vs. BRCYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 35.21% return, which is significantly higher than BRCYX's 26.35% return. Over the past 10 years, GSG has outperformed BRCYX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while BRCYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.


GSG

1D
-2.68%
1M
9.90%
6M
27.47%
YTD
35.21%
1Y
38.52%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*
8.24%
ALL TIME*
-2.27%

BRCYX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.20%
6M
20.03%
YTD
26.35%
1Y
42.93%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
7.61%
ALL TIME*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$17.98M$16.40M$25.53M

GSG vs. BRCYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
35.21%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
26.35%18.82%5.70%-3.15%7.94%19.54%7.89%4.49%-12.03%4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GSG and BRCYX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.75

The correlation between GSG and BRCYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSG vs. BRCYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BRCYX
BRCYX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BRCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSG vs. BRCYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSGBRCYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.47

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

8.13

-1.53

GSG vs. BRCYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the BRCYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSG and BRCYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSG vs. BRCYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than BRCYX's maximum drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and BRCYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGBRCYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.62%

-60.05%

-29.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-17.02%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-17.02%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-20.42%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

-38.09%

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.18%

-9.35%

-49.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-27.04%

-36.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

5.16%

+0.69%

Volatility

GSG vs. BRCYX - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund (BRCYX) at 4.24%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRCYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGBRCYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.75%

4.24%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.27%

15.57%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.37%

18.23%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

15.76%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

14.32%

+7.75%

GSG vs. BRCYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCYX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSG vs. BRCYX - Dividend Comparison

GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRCYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund
10.85%13.71%4.95%3.71%9.93%16.64%0.00%0.91%0.25%0.01%2.74%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSG and BRCYX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to BRCYX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSG dropped -89.62% vs BRCYX's -60.05%.

BRCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSG and BRCYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer