PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSG vs. BDRY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSG vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.


GSG

1D
-1.03%
1M
-12.93%
YTD
25.54%
6M
23.88%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
6.58%

BDRY

1D
1.64%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
34.21%
6M
34.67%
1Y
103.63%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
-16.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSG vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
25.54%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-16.15%
BDRY
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
34.21%44.24%-47.40%25.79%-68.84%282.99%-50.16%-15.92%-27.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GSG and BDRY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2018

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSG vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BDRY
BDRY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BDRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDRY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BDRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDRY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSG vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSGBDRYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

4.82

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

13.59

-6.64

GSG vs. BDRY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the BDRY Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSG and BDRY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSG vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and BDRY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGBDRYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.62%

-89.16%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-21.60%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-69.71%

+52.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

-89.16%

+60.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.10%

-71.65%

+9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-58.43%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

7.65%

-3.64%

Volatility

GSG vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) is 5.46%, while Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that GSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGBDRYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

7.30%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.82%

29.14%

-8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.17%

42.10%

-18.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.67%

60.24%

-37.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

62.40%

-40.39%

GSG vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSG vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSG nor BDRY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GSG and BDRY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDRY has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to GSG (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSG dropped -89.62% vs BDRY's -89.16%.

On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 12.78% vs -16.41% for BDRY. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 12.78% return vs -16.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.

GSG and BDRY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index, while BDRY tracks Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSG and 3.76% for BDRY.

BDRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSG and BDRY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer