PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSEP vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSEP

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.97%
YTD
5.39%
6M
5.72%
1Y
13.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


GSEP vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSEP
OCTQ

Technology

36.2%
35.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.4%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.8%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.2%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

GSEP
36.2%
OCTQ
35.3%

Financial Services

GSEP
11.9%
OCTQ
13.4%

Communication Services

GSEP
10.9%
OCTQ
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSEP
10.1%
OCTQ
10.6%

Healthcare

GSEP
8.4%
OCTQ
8.8%

Industrials

GSEP
8.1%
OCTQ
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSEP
4.9%
OCTQ
5.2%

Energy

GSEP
3.5%
OCTQ
3.0%

Utilities

GSEP
2.3%
OCTQ
2.5%

Real Estate

GSEP
1.9%
OCTQ
2.0%

Basic Materials

GSEP
1.8%
OCTQ
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSEP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSEP
GSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – September (GSEP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSEPOCTQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.98

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSEPOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

Drawdowns

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSEP drawdown since its inception was -10.09%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEP and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSEPOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

0.00%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSEPOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

0.00%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.59%

0.00%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.59%

0.00%

+7.59%

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSEP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSEP nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GSEP.

GSEP and OCTQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GSEP and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSEP and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer