GSCMX vs. MOFIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX).

GSCMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 2, 2019. MOFIX is managed by Mercer Funds. It was launched on Aug 20, 2013.

Performance

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	-1.88%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.42%	9.24%	1.17%
MOFIX Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund	-2.95%	8.60%	2.23%	12.22%	-11.57%	-1.15%	5.31%	0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than MOFIX's -2.95% return.

GSCMX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -1.88%
• 6M: -0.44%
• 1Y: 4.90%
• 3Y*: 6.80%
• 5Y*: 2.89%
• 10Y*: —

MOFIX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: -2.95%
• 6M: -2.34%
• 1Y: 3.22%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: 1.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MOFIX's 0.44% expense ratio.

GSCMX

Goldman Sachs Income Fund

MOFIX

Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund

Return for Risk

GSCMX vs. MOFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MOFIX

MOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
MOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
MOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCMX	MOFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.99	+0.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	1.30	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.99	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	4.05	+4.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the MOFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCMX and MOFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCMX	MOFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	0.99	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.24	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.29	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between GSCMX and MOFIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Dividend Comparison

GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than MOFIX's 3.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	4.78%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%
MOFIX Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund	3.42%	3.32%	6.91%	6.44%	3.81%	4.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, roughly equal to the maximum MOFIX drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and MOFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCMX	MOFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-19.96%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-3.52%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.20%	-19.00%	+0.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.71%	-3.40%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-5.27%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	0.86%	-0.20%

Volatility

GSCMX vs. MOFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) is 1.34%, while Mercer Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (MOFIX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that GSCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCMX	MOFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	1.42%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.02%	2.12%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	3.86%	-0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.32%	7.25%	-2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.82%	7.25%	-1.43%