GSCMX vs. CRMVX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) and CRMVX (Potomac Managed Volatility Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GSCMX returned 2.95%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for CRMVX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSCMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for CRMVX.

Performance

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than CRMVX's 1.81% return.

GSCMX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: 2.95%
• 10Y*: —

CRMVX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.69%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: 2.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	0.57%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.42%	8.86%
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund	1.81%	4.91%	1.22%	0.25%	4.76%	0.61%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCMX and CRMVX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020	0.36

The correlation between GSCMX and CRMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GSCMX vs. CRMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CRMVX

CRMVX Risk / Return Rank: 64
CRMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CRMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CRMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CRMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCMX	CRMVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.98	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.80	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	4.96	-2.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	15.29	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the CRMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCMX and CRMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCMX	CRMVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.98	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.00	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.00	+0.65

Drawdowns

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum CRMVX drawdown of -97.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and CRMVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCMX	CRMVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-97.39%	+77.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-1.62%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	-97.39%	+94.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.20%	-97.39%	+79.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-97.11%	+96.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-24.30%	+20.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	0.52%	+0.11%

Volatility

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) is 1.09%, while Potomac Managed Volatility Fund (CRMVX) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that GSCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCMX	CRMVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	1.34%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	2.99%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17%	4.07%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	1,597.76%	-1,593.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.79%	1,468.01%	-1,462.22%

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CRMVX's 1.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSCMX vs. CRMVX - Dividend Comparison

GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than CRMVX's 5.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRMVX Potomac Managed Volatility Fund	5.65%	5.75%	3.75%	2.74%	0.57%	2.59%	0.95%	0.00%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	5.09%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSCMX and CRMVX in my portfolio?

GSCMX and CRMVX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSCMX or CRMVX?

CRMVX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to GSCMX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCMX dropped -20.12% vs CRMVX's -97.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.