GSCMX vs. BWG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GSCMX (Goldman Sachs Income Fund) and BWG (BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GSCMX returned 3.01%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for BWG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSCMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for BWG.

Performance

GSCMX vs. BWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSCMX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's -0.48% return.

GSCMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: —

BWG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -0.84%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 5.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSCMX vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	0.69%	8.70%	6.13%	10.60%	-10.75%	0.42%	9.24%	1.17%
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	-0.48%	17.38%	7.31%	15.94%	-21.53%	1.34%	6.30%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GSCMX and BWG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019	0.48

Return for Risk

GSCMX vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSCMX

GSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
GSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
GSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BWG

BWG Risk / Return Rank: 11
BWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BWG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BWG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSCMX vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSCMX	BWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	0.93	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	1.46	+1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.17	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	0.80	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.99	2.57	+7.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSCMX vs. BWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the BWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSCMX and BWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSCMX	BWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	0.93	+1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.13	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.21	+0.44

Drawdowns

GSCMX vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSCMX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCMX and BWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSCMX	BWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-35.39%	+15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-12.03%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.24%	-14.00%	+10.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.20%	-34.10%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-4.60%	+4.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-10.86%	+7.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.63%	3.75%	-3.12%

Volatility

GSCMX vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Income Fund (GSCMX) is 1.14%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that GSCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSCMX	BWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	2.68%	-1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	8.52%	-5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17%	10.37%	-7.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	14.10%	-9.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.79%	15.01%	-9.22%

GSCMX vs. BWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSCMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BWG's 2.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSCMX vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison

GSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, less than BWG's 12.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	12.11%	11.47%	12.00%	11.73%	13.25%	8.20%	6.81%	6.55%	8.70%	8.35%	10.31%	16.41%
GSCMX Goldman Sachs Income Fund	5.09%	5.09%	5.39%	4.71%	8.43%	3.51%	3.95%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSCMX and BWG in my portfolio?

GSCMX and BWG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSCMX or BWG?

BWG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to GSCMX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSCMX dropped -20.12% vs BWG's -35.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.