GSCGX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GSCGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 20, 1990. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | -7.80% | 15.70% | 38.33% | 26.49% | -19.82% | 24.47% | 22.78% | 32.33% | -2.82% | 31.84% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCGX achieves a -7.80% return, which is significantly lower than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCGX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 14.80%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
GSCGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -7.80%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- 12.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSCGX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GSCGX
GSIFX
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSCGX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.91 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.12 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 3.23 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSCGX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.48 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.30 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCGX and GSIFX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.14%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | 13.14% | 12.12% | 25.42% | 0.46% | 8.75% | 10.68% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 49.12% | 8.67% | 1.45% | 8.72% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCGX drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCGX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCGX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -59.25% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -12.15% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -31.94% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | -35.00% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -11.48% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -15.30% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.06% | -0.36% |
Volatility
GSCGX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) is 4.57%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSCGX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 6.71% | -2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 11.13% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 16.87% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 16.71% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 17.32% | +3.33% |