PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSC vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSC achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GSC has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 10.81%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


GSC

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.25%
YTD
15.37%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
21.00%
10Y*
10.81%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
15.37%6.29%13.79%33.52%28.40%58.09%-33.08%29.69%-19.52%2.90%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GSC and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.50

The correlation between GSC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSC vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSC
DBO

Technology

23.6%

-

Industrials

17.5%

-

Financial Services

16.5%
116.0%

Healthcare

12.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%

-

Basic Materials

6.4%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Communication Services

0.9%

-

Technology

GSC
23.6%
DBO

-

Industrials

GSC
17.5%
DBO

-

Financial Services

GSC
16.5%
DBO
116.0%

Healthcare

GSC
12.4%
DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

GSC
8.8%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

GSC
6.4%
DBO

-

Energy

GSC
4.2%
DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

GSC
3.8%
DBO

-

Utilities

GSC
3.1%
DBO

-

Real Estate

GSC
2.6%
DBO

-

Communication Services

GSC
0.9%
DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSC
GSC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSC Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSCDBODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

2.34

-2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.80

2.94

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.38

+0.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

4.44

-3.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.61

9.02

-7.42

GSC vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSC and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSCDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.34

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.50

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.36

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.02

-0.02

Drawdowns

GSC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSC drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, roughly equal to the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSC and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSCDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.63%

-90.18%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.25%

-18.19%

-40.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.25%

-28.20%

-30.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-37.68%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.06%

-61.69%

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.48%

-51.38%

+19.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-62.25%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.91%

8.92%

+7.99%

Volatility

GSC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) is 5.99%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that GSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSCDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

12.61%

-6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

203.12%

28.20%

+174.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

403.80%

34.46%

+369.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

218.92%

32.29%

+186.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.38%

31.78%

+128.60%

GSC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

GSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
GSC
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF
0.17%0.16%0.66%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSC and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to GSC (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSC dropped -88.63% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 10.81% for GSC. On fees, GSC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.17% for GSC.

GSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GSC and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSC and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer