PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSAHX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAHX achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than GCIIX's 13.87% return.


GSAHX

1D
3.17%
1M
-4.25%
6M
17.69%
YTD
21.53%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.23%

GCIIX

1D
2.78%
1M
0.63%
6M
7.20%
YTD
13.87%
1Y
31.85%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.19%
ALL TIME*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSAHX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund
21.53%9.13%21.65%18.80%-28.78%8.38%54.70%7.21%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
13.87%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAHX and GCIIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.69

The correlation between GSAHX and GCIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSAHX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSAHX
GSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSAHXGCIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.55

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

9.46

-0.03

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAHX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, smaller than the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSAHXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.67%

-61.08%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-12.33%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.04%

-13.25%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.67%

-30.58%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.29%

-0.48%

-6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.08%

-14.97%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.31%

-0.14%

Volatility

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) at 4.92%. This indicates that GSAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSAHXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

4.92%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.81%

13.98%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.39%

16.25%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

16.24%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

16.54%

+10.38%

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSAHX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GSAHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.84%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GSAHX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%10.59%7.28%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSAHX and GCIIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSAHX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to GCIIX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAHX dropped -41.67% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSAHX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer