GSAHX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

GSAHX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GSAHX returned 7.53%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for FGROX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSAHX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSAHX achieves a 26.93% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 33.50% return.

GSAHX

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 4.14%
• 6M: 25.44%
• YTD: 26.93%
• 1Y: 35.19%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: —

FGROX

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 5.24%
• 6M: 31.49%
• YTD: 33.50%
• 1Y: 64.65%
• 3Y*: 30.59%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: 16.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund	26.93%	9.13%	21.65%	18.80%	-28.78%	8.38%	54.70%	7.21%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	33.50%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GSAHX and FGROX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019	0.94

The correlation between GSAHX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSAHX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSAHX

GSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
GSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSAHX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.54	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	3.19	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.40	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.73	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	19.69	-6.05

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSAHX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSAHX drawdown since its inception was -41.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FGROX drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSAHX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSAHX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.67%	-41.48%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-14.36%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.04%	-28.61%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.67%	-38.52%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	-3.46%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-10.21%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	3.43%	-0.73%

Volatility

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund (GSAHX) is 8.39%, while Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that GSAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSAHX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.39%	9.96%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.20%	20.58%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.81%	26.78%	-4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.83%	25.91%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.96%	25.26%	+1.70%

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSAHX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSAHX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

GSAHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	8.53%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%
GSAHX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.59%	7.28%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSAHX and FGROX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GSAHX and FGROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSAHX or FGROX?

FGROX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to GSAHX (8.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSAHX dropped -41.67% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.