GRZZX vs. RYCQX
GRZZX (Grizzly Short Fund) and RYCQX (Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX returned -0.91%/yr vs -12.24%/yr for RYCQX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRZZX charges 1.61%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for RYCQX.
Performance
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRZZX achieves a -7.85% return, which is significantly higher than RYCQX's -15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX has outperformed RYCQX with an annualized return of -0.91%, while RYCQX has yielded a comparatively lower -12.24% annualized return.
GRZZX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- -6.07%
- 5Y*
- -3.78%
- 10Y*
- -0.91%
RYCQX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -15.17%
- 1Y
- -21.89%
- 3Y*
- -11.24%
- 5Y*
- -6.59%
- 10Y*
- -12.24%
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | -7.85% | -2.98% | -6.74% | -18.72% | 22.43% | -15.87% | -41.33% | -29.43% | 301.98% | -19.84% |
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | -15.17% | -9.40% | -6.15% | -10.73% | 16.50% | -18.59% | -31.59% | -20.84% | 10.41% | -14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRZZX and RYCQX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.90 |
The correlation between GRZZX and RYCQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRZZX vs. RYCQX — Risk / Return Rank
GRZZX
RYCQX
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) and Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRZZX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.82 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.84 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -1.45 | +0.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRZZX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCQX drawdown of -96.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRZZX and RYCQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRZZX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -96.16% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.84% | -26.78% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.08% | -42.85% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.06% | -42.88% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.07% | -74.27% | +1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.73% | -96.07% | +6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.43% | -70.65% | +1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 15.47% | -8.57% |
Volatility
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) is 4.01%, while Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that GRZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRZZX | RYCQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 4.87% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 14.14% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 19.46% | -5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 23.46% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.65% | 23.82% | +72.83% |
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRZZX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCQX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRZZX vs. RYCQX - Dividend Comparison
GRZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than RYCQX's 9.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | 4.96% | 6.00% | 10.30% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
RYCQX Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund | 9.28% | 7.87% | 7.14% | 9.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRZZX and RYCQX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCQX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GRZZX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRZZX dropped -91.80% vs RYCQX's -96.16%.
GRZZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRZZX and RYCQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer