PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCQX vs. RYCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCQX achieves a -14.69% return, which is significantly lower than RYCLX's -12.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCQX has underperformed RYCLX with an annualized return of -12.08%, while RYCLX has yielded a comparatively higher -10.93% annualized return.


RYCQX

1D
-1.34%
1M
2.10%
6M
-10.56%
YTD
-14.69%
1Y
-24.47%
3Y*
-10.06%
5Y*
-6.22%
10Y*
-12.08%
ALL TIME*
-12.61%

RYCLX

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.19%
6M
-9.12%
YTD
-12.87%
1Y
-15.27%
3Y*
-6.53%
5Y*
-5.66%
10Y*
-10.93%
ALL TIME*
-12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCQX
Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund
-14.69%-9.40%-6.15%-10.73%16.50%-18.59%-31.59%-20.84%10.41%-14.20%
RYCLX
Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund
-12.87%-1.04%-5.59%-8.75%8.93%-24.21%-25.53%-21.03%11.39%-14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCQX and RYCLX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.95

The correlation between RYCQX and RYCLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCQX vs. RYCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYCQX
RYCQX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYCQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCQX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCQX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCLX
RYCLX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYCQXRYCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

0.88

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.70

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

-1.25

-0.09

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCQX Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the RYCLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCQX and RYCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCQX drawdown since its inception was -96.16%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCLX drawdown of -95.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCQX and RYCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCQXRYCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.16%

-95.66%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-18.50%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.85%

-32.43%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.88%

-34.96%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.27%

-71.12%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.04%

-95.59%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.71%

-70.36%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.46%

10.37%

+6.09%

Volatility

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund (RYCQX) and Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCQXRYCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

3.81%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

11.69%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

15.80%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.38%

20.50%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.82%

21.42%

+2.40%

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYCQX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RYCLX's 2.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYCQX vs. RYCLX - Dividend Comparison

RYCQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, less than RYCLX's 37.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RYCLX
Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund
37.88%33.01%25.75%9.12%0.00%0.00%0.76%0.89%
RYCQX
Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 Strategy Fund
9.22%7.87%7.14%9.87%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYCQX and RYCLX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCLX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to RYCQX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCQX dropped -96.16% vs RYCLX's -95.66%.

RYCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCQX and RYCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer