PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRW vs. FPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRW vs. FPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRW vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF
-10.76%-5.07%11.08%
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
-1.32%37.62%20.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRW achieves a -10.76% return, which is significantly lower than FPX's -1.32% return.


GRW

1D
0.94%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
-10.76%
6M
-13.16%
1Y
-16.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FPX

1D
1.61%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
-1.32%
6M
-2.81%
1Y
43.47%
3Y*
24.63%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRW vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GRW vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRW
GRW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRW vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRWFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.93

1.49

-2.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.26

2.05

-3.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.28

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

3.19

-3.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.61

10.78

-12.38

GRW vs. FPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRW Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the FPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRW and FPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRWFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.93

1.49

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.53

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between GRW and FPX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GRW vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison

GRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than FPX's 0.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRW
TCW Durable Growth ETF
0.30%0.27%11.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%

Drawdowns

GRW vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -23.84%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and FPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRWFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.84%

-56.29%

+32.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.84%

-14.19%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.01%

-6.75%

-14.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-11.43%

+5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

4.20%

+5.76%

Volatility

GRW vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is 5.74%, while First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that GRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRWFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

9.11%

-3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

18.68%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

29.37%

-11.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

26.54%

-10.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

24.17%

-7.96%