GRW vs. FENY
GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) and FENY (Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while FENY is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. GRW is actively managed, while FENY is passively managed. Their -0.57 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GRW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FENY.
Performance
GRW vs. FENY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GRW
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FENY
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 18.35%
- YTD
- 35.12%
- 1Y
- 43.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.95M | $44.20M | $53.46M | |
| $173.33K | $124.39K | $212.92K |
GRW vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 2.98% |
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRW and FENY is -0.57, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.57 |
GRW vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRW
FENY
Industrials
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
GRW
FENY
Technology
GRW
FENY
-
Financial Services
GRW
FENY
-
Communication Services
GRW
FENY
-
Consumer Cyclical
GRW
FENY
-
Basic Materials
GRW
FENY
Healthcare
GRW
FENY
-
Consumer Defensive
GRW
-
FENY
-
Energy
GRW
-
FENY
Real Estate
GRW
-
FENY
-
Utilities
GRW
-
FENY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRW vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank
GRW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FENY
GRW vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRW vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRW drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRW and FENY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -74.35% | +70.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -4.34% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -22.95% | +21.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.56% | — |
Volatility
GRW vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRW | FENY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 20.94% | -5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 26.20% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 29.78% | -14.06% |
GRW vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRW vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison
GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FENY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FENY Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF | 2.35% | 3.18% | 3.05% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.69% | 4.60% | 6.43% | 3.21% | 2.94% | 2.29% | 3.05% |
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRW and FENY have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.
FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.
GRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRW and 0.08% for FENY.
Find the right allocation for GRW and FENY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer