GRT-UN.TO vs. KT
GRT-UN.TO (Granite Real Estate Investment Trust) and KT (KT Corporation) are both stocks. GRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while KT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO returned 14.48%/yr vs 6.91%/yr for KT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while KT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than KT's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has outperformed KT with an annualized return of 14.48%, while KT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.
GRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 6M
- 28.31%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
KT
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- -1.22%
- 3Y*
- 24.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 19.72% | 22.80% | -4.30% | 15.18% | -31.88% | 40.16% | 22.56% | 29.65% | 14.45% | 15.87% |
KT KT Corporation | 1.26% | 21.90% | 30.09% | 2.51% | 20.52% | 20.94% | -7.34% | -21.79% | -1.25% | 3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and KT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$5.83B
KT:
$10.39B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$6.39
KT:
$3.14K
GRT-UN.TO:
15.07
KT:
0.01
GRT-UN.TO:
0.93
KT:
0.00
GRT-UN.TO:
9.32
KT:
0.00
GRT-UN.TO:
1.04
KT:
0.00
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$629.87M
KT:
$28.39T
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$517.51M
KT:
$15.90T
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$513.85M
KT:
$5.41T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT — Risk / Return Rank
GRT-UN.TO
KT
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and KT Corporation (KT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRT-UN.TO | KT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.01 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | -0.05 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | -0.12 | +10.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRT-UN.TO | KT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | -0.06 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.59 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.29 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.11 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than KT's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and KT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRT-UN.TO | KT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -58.56% | -28.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -26.68% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.99% | -26.68% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | -26.68% | -11.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.89% | -58.53% | +13.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -21.75% | +20.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.98% | -23.42% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 9.84% | -5.83% |
Volatility
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.88%, while KT Corporation (KT) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRT-UN.TO | KT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 7.54% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.87% | 16.66% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 21.68% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 23.15% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 24.02% | -1.58% |
Dividends
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Dividend Comparison
GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than KT's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.61% | 4.18% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.50% | 2.86% | 3.43% | 4.25% | 5.69% | 5.31% | 5.42% | 1.62% |
KT KT Corporation | 3.34% | 4.24% | 3.50% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 6.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 1.84% |
Financials
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and KT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRT-UN.TO vs. KT - Profitability Comparison
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.
KT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.
KT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.
KT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRT-UN.TO and KT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and KT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer