GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO
GRT-UN.TO (Granite Real Estate Investment Trust) and CNQ.TO (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) are both stocks. GRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while CNQ.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO returned 14.52%/yr vs 23.43%/yr for CNQ.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 37.61% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has underperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 14.52%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.43% annualized return.
GRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 23.98%
- 1Y
- 37.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
CNQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 37.61%
- 6M
- 40.79%
- 1Y
- 47.63%
- 3Y*
- 27.02%
- 5Y*
- 33.86%
- 10Y*
- 23.43%
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 17.52% | 22.80% | -4.30% | 15.18% | -31.88% | 40.16% | 22.56% | 29.65% | 14.45% | 15.87% |
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 37.61% | 10.42% | 8.27% | 26.98% | 63.10% | 91.26% | -12.94% | 38.84% | -21.36% | 10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and CNQ.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and CNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$5.73B
CNQ.TO:
CA$132.89B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$6.39
CNQ.TO:
CA$4.65
GRT-UN.TO:
14.79
CNQ.TO:
13.64
GRT-UN.TO:
0.91
CNQ.TO:
0.66
GRT-UN.TO:
9.15
CNQ.TO:
3.34
GRT-UN.TO:
1.02
CNQ.TO:
2.98
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$629.87M
CNQ.TO:
CA$39.61B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$517.51M
CNQ.TO:
CA$12.42B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$513.85M
CNQ.TO:
CA$17.78B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GRT-UN.TO
CNQ.TO
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRT-UN.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.12 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 7.98 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than CNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and CNQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRT-UN.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -74.63% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -15.33% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.99% | -33.12% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | -33.12% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.89% | -74.63% | +29.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -8.72% | +6.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -17.63% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 5.98% | -1.96% |
Volatility
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.69%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) has a volatility of 8.91%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRT-UN.TO | CNQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 8.91% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 24.23% | -9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 28.98% | -9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 30.61% | -8.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 38.12% | -15.68% |
Dividends
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than CNQ.TO's 3.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ.TO Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 3.77% | 5.05% | 6.00% | 8.53% | 12.23% | 7.63% | 11.35% | 7.29% | 8.31% | 5.00% | 4.49% | 6.22% |
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.68% | 4.18% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.50% | 2.86% | 3.43% | 4.25% | 5.69% | 5.31% | 5.42% | 1.62% |
Financials
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRT-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Profitability Comparison
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.
CNQ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 10.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.
CNQ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.
CNQ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRT-UN.TO and CNQ.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and CNQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer