PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than AD-UN.TO's 16.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has outperformed AD-UN.TO with an annualized return of 14.48%, while AD-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.


GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%

AD-UN.TO

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.93%
YTD
16.48%
6M
20.80%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
24.98%
5Y*
15.84%
10Y*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
16.48%15.38%27.16%10.82%-7.62%33.79%-23.76%40.26%-9.96%-6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2008

0.20

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

AD-UN.TO:

CA$1.27B

EPS

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

AD-UN.TO:

CA$2.23

PE Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

AD-UN.TO:

10.57

PEG Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

AD-UN.TO:

31.72

PS Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

AD-UN.TO:

5.20

PB Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

AD-UN.TO:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$220.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$197.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

AD-UN.TO:

CA$179.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

AD-UN.TO
AD-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRT-UN.TOAD-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.70

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

10.16

+0.12

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRT-UN.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.94

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.70

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.18

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Drawdowns

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than AD-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRT-UN.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-75.11%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-12.74%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.99%

-18.69%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.82%

-29.73%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.89%

-73.03%

+28.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.88%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-17.25%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.38%

+0.63%

Volatility

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) at 4.20%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AD-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRT-UN.TOAD-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

4.20%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

13.81%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

17.75%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

22.65%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

32.24%

-9.80%

Dividends

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than AD-UN.TO's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
6.03%6.75%7.10%8.35%8.29%6.81%8.76%7.55%9.57%7.84%6.76%6.66%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
165.83M
65.37M
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AD-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

GRT-UN.TO vs. AD-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
81.0%
89.3%
Portfolio components
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

AD-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a gross profit of 58.38M and revenue of 65.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

AD-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported an operating income of 47.42M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 72.5%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.

AD-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a net income of 40.41M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in a net margin of 61.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and AD-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer