PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) and AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AD-UN.TO achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than AGF-B.TO's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AD-UN.TO has underperformed AGF-B.TO with an annualized return of 5.99%, while AGF-B.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.05% annualized return.


AD-UN.TO

1D
-1.06%
1M
5.17%
YTD
15.79%
6M
19.55%
1Y
35.94%
3Y*
24.59%
5Y*
15.77%
10Y*
5.99%

AGF-B.TO

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.47%
YTD
7.94%
6M
20.69%
1Y
47.54%
3Y*
41.47%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
19.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
15.79%15.38%27.16%10.82%-7.62%33.79%-23.76%40.26%-9.96%-6.82%
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
7.94%59.26%45.89%15.54%-10.40%43.95%1.07%41.60%-38.19%36.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

0.27

Over the past year, AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AD-UN.TO:

CA$1.26B

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.14B

EPS

AD-UN.TO:

CA$2.23

AGF-B.TO:

CA$1.73

PE Ratio

AD-UN.TO:

10.51

AGF-B.TO:

10.01

PEG Ratio

AD-UN.TO:

31.53

AGF-B.TO:

0.26

PS Ratio

AD-UN.TO:

5.17

AGF-B.TO:

2.06

PB Ratio

AD-UN.TO:

1.10

AGF-B.TO:

0.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

AD-UN.TO:

CA$220.04M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$561.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AD-UN.TO:

CA$197.90M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$342.49M

EBITDA (TTM)

AD-UN.TO:

CA$179.07M

AGF-B.TO:

CA$163.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AD-UN.TO
AD-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AD-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AGF-B.TO
AGF-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGF-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) and AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AD-UN.TOAGF-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.87

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

5.49

+5.20

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AD-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the AGF-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AD-UN.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.47

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.80

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.58

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.28

+0.16

Drawdowns

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AD-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, smaller than the maximum AGF-B.TO drawdown of -90.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AD-UN.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.93%

-90.57%

+15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.74%

-25.57%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

-25.57%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.73%

-29.90%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.03%

-65.63%

-7.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-15.87%

+13.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-45.84%

+29.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

8.69%

-5.32%

Volatility

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (AD-UN.TO) is 3.98%, while AGF Management Ltd (AGF-B.TO) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that AD-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGF-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AD-UN.TOAGF-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

6.95%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

26.95%

-13.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

32.66%

-14.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

29.20%

-6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.24%

32.83%

-0.59%

Dividends

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

AD-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than AGF-B.TO's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AD-UN.TO
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
6.07%6.75%7.10%8.35%8.29%6.81%8.76%7.55%9.57%7.84%7.49%6.66%
AGF-B.TO
AGF Management Ltd
2.95%3.01%4.26%5.58%5.52%4.07%5.26%4.97%6.64%3.91%3.83%11.35%

Financials

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust and AGF Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
65.37M
143.70M
(AD-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AGF-B.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

AD-UN.TO vs. AGF-B.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust and AGF Management Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
89.3%
50.9%
Portfolio components
AD-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a gross profit of 58.38M and revenue of 65.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.3%.

AGF-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 73.16M and revenue of 143.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

AD-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported an operating income of 47.42M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 72.5%.

AGF-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported an operating income of 33.41M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.

AD-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust reported a net income of 40.41M and revenue of 65.37M, resulting in a net margin of 61.8%.

AGF-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGF Management Ltd reported a net income of 18.04M and revenue of 143.70M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AD-UN.TO and AGF-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer