GRSPX vs. MHELX
GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, GRSPX returned 10.41%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for MHELX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRSPX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.
Performance
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRSPX having a 20.56% return and MHELX slightly higher at 20.86%. Over the past 10 years, GRSPX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 10.41%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.
GRSPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 6M
- 18.80%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
MHELX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 37.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 20.56% | 6.12% | 16.03% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 3.81% | 20.84% | -10.21% | 7.84% |
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 20.86% | 3.45% | 12.51% | 16.30% | -20.27% | 14.07% | 20.57% | 22.49% | -12.76% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRSPX and MHELX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1998 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GRSPX and MHELX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRSPX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank
GRSPX
MHELX
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRSPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 4.80 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.86 | 16.13 | -7.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRSPX drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRSPX and MHELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRSPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -61.24% | +25.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.41% | -8.52% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -30.81% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -32.01% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -39.02% | +3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | 0.00% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -12.91% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.53% | +0.56% |
Volatility
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison
Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a higher volatility of 50.72% compared to MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) at 5.62%. This indicates that GRSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRSPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.72% | 5.62% | +45.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.94% | 15.78% | +35.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.42% | 19.69% | +36.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 21.09% | +7.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 20.98% | +1.53% |
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRSPX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRSPX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison
GRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than MHELX's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.80% | 9.40% | 7.14% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 5.97% | 0.00% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 14.45% | 5.03% | 2.70% | 6.13% | 0.00% | 5.17% | 5.51% | 6.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRSPX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (50.72%) compared to MHELX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRSPX dropped -35.67% vs MHELX's -61.24%.
MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRSPX and MHELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer