GRRR vs. QBTS
GRRR (Gorilla Technology Group Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GRRR in Software - Infrastructure, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past 3 years, GRRR returned -0.38%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRRR vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRRR achieves a 59.34% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.
GRRR
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- 59.34%
- 6M
- 26.64%
- 1Y
- -15.49%
- 3Y*
- -0.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRRR vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRRR Gorilla Technology Group Inc. | 59.34% | -39.53% | 234.82% | -93.35% | -29.48% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRRR and QBTS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, GRRR and QBTS have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GRRR:
$452.96M
QBTS:
$8.59B
GRRR:
-$1.81
QBTS:
-$1.08
GRRR:
3.77
QBTS:
637.12
GRRR:
2.58
QBTS:
7.64
GRRR:
$111.33M
QBTS:
$12.44M
GRRR:
$33.42M
QBTS:
$8.25M
GRRR:
-$22.71M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRRR vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
GRRR
QBTS
GRRR vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRRR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.16 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.67 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 1.16 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRRR vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRRR drawdown since its inception was -99.38%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRRR and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRRR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.38% | -96.67% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.45% | -71.01% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.27% | -79.17% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.20% | -47.81% | -47.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.93% | -65.66% | -26.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.22% | 40.64% | +0.58% |
Volatility
GRRR vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) is 33.91%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that GRRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRRR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.91% | 42.66% | -8.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.91% | 76.89% | -16.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.88% | 108.46% | -20.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.67% | 150.99% | +12.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.67% | 150.99% | +12.68% |
Dividends
GRRR vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither GRRR nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GRRR vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gorilla Technology Group Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GRRR and QBTS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to GRRR (33.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRRR dropped -99.38% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRRR and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer