PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPZ vs. VGUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than VGUS's 1.44% return.


GRPZ

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
10.84%
6M
8.51%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGUS

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and VGUS is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VGUS
VGUS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VGUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGUS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VGUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGUS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPZVGUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-33.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

10.91

-9.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

54.56

-52.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

414.20

-407.61

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the VGUS Sharpe Ratio of 12.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and VGUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRPZVGUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

12.10

-10.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

11.72

-11.33

Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and VGUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPZVGUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-0.07%

-27.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-0.07%

-9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

0.00%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-0.00%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

0.01%

+3.31%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS) at 0.11%. This indicates that GRPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPZVGUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

0.11%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

0.18%

+11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

0.33%

+17.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

0.34%

+20.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

0.34%

+20.83%

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPZ vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VGUS's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.91%0.97%0.73%
VGUS
Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF
3.61%3.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRPZ and VGUS have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRPZ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to VGUS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPZ dropped -27.87% vs VGUS's -0.07%.

On 1-year performance, GRPZ leads with 21.80% vs 3.95% for VGUS. On fees, VGUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VGUS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRPZ has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPZ.

VGUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.91% for GRPZ.

GRPZ is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VGUS is Ultrashort Bond. GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index, while VGUS tracks Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPZ and 0.07% for VGUS.

VGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.10 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPZ and VGUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer