GRPZ vs. SPHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD).
GRPZ and SPHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GRPZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2024. SPHD is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Low Volatility High Dividend index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both GRPZ and SPHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 3.13% | 3.09% | 4.27% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.64% | 3.41% | 12.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 4.64% return.
GRPZ
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 3.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GRPZ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
GRPZ
SPHD
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRPZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.22 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 0.41 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 0.38 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 1.22 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRPZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.22 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.59 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPZ and SPHD is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than SPHD's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 0.98% | 0.97% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.31% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Drawdowns
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and SPHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.87% | -41.39% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.12% | -11.33% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -5.14% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -4.70% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.67% | +0.31% |
Volatility
GRPZ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 3.21%. This indicates that GRPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GRPZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 3.21% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 7.91% | +4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.51% | 14.51% | +8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 14.20% | +7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 17.65% | +3.94% |