GRPZ vs. RZG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GRPZ (Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF) and RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Invesco - GRPZ tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index while RZG tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GRPZ returned 26.46% vs 40.75% for RZG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

GRPZ vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 16.31% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 27.46% return.

GRPZ

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 16.31%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 26.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RZG

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 8.64%
• YTD: 27.46%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 40.75%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 10.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPZ vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	16.31%	3.09%	4.27%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	27.46%	10.22%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and RZG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.91

The correlation between GRPZ and RZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRPZ vs. RZG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GRPZ	RZG
Financial Services	28.3%	15.4%
Industrials	16.1%	16.8%
Healthcare	15.8%	22.7%
Energy	12.2%	2.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	9.1%
Technology	7.6%	18.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.4%
Basic Materials	2.3%	0.4%
Communication Services	0.8%	3.5%
Real Estate	-	5.5%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ

GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 50
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RZG

RZG Risk / Return Rank: 77
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRPZ	RZG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.16	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.15	-0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	4.75	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.97	16.04	-8.07

GRPZ vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and RZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and RZG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRPZ	RZG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.87%	-58.52%	+30.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.53%	-8.63%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.21%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-12.09%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	2.55%	+0.78%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is 4.07%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that GRPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRPZ	RZG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	5.43%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	14.15%	-2.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	18.98%	-1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.04%	23.04%	-2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.04%	24.65%	-3.61%

GRPZ vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRPZ and RZG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

GRPZ vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than RZG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF	0.93%	0.97%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	0.44%	0.37%	0.95%	1.43%	1.59%	0.22%	0.49%	0.70%	0.46%	0.44%	0.65%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRPZ and RZG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, GRPZ and RZG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GRPZ or RZG?

RZG has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to GRPZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPZ dropped -27.87% vs RZG's -58.52%.

Which ETF is better, GRPZ or RZG?

On 1-year performance, RZG leads with 40.75% vs 26.46% for GRPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, GRPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRPZ or RZG?

Over the 1-year period, RZG has performed better with a 40.75% return vs 26.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRPZ or RZG?

GRPZ and RZG have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRPZ or RZG?

GRPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.44% for RZG.

What is the main difference between GRPZ and RZG?

GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index, while RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.