PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPZ vs. RZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRPZ vs. RZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRPZ vs. RZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
3.13%3.09%4.27%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
4.96%10.22%3.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than RZG's 4.96% return.


GRPZ

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
3.13%
6M
2.96%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RZG

1D
4.17%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
4.96%
6M
4.88%
1Y
22.42%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRPZ vs. RZG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRPZ and RZG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. RZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. RZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPZRZGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.99

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.55

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.77

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

7.39

-2.99

GRPZ vs. RZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the RZG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and RZG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRPZRZGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.99

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.35

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and RZG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GRPZ vs. RZG - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than RZG's 0.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.98%0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.47%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%

Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. RZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum RZG drawdown of -58.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and RZG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPZRZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-58.52%

+30.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-13.42%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-4.71%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-12.22%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.21%

+0.77%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. RZG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is 5.70%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that GRPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRPZRZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

8.31%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

14.04%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

22.70%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

23.09%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

24.62%

-3.03%