PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPZ vs. FLQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
3.13%3.09%4.27%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
-0.70%5.04%4.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLQS's -0.70% return.


GRPZ

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
3.13%
6M
2.96%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLQS

1D
1.70%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRPZ vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GRPZ and FLQS have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPZFLQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.52

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.88

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.11

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.87

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

3.00

+1.39

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the FLQS Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and FLQS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRPZFLQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.52

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.35

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and FLQS is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FLQS's 1.45% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.98%0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.45%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%

Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and FLQS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPZFLQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-42.16%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-12.41%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-6.55%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-8.14%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.59%

+0.39%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) at 5.22%. This indicates that GRPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRPZFLQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

5.22%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

10.90%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

19.33%

+3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

19.35%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.81%

-0.22%