GRPM vs. SPMD
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - GRPM tracks the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index while SPMD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRPM returned 11.23%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for SPMD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
GRPM vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 14.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GRPM has underperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 11.23%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.
GRPM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
SPMD
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
GRPM vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 6.14% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 26.35% | 15.60% | 23.05% | -12.45% | 13.05% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 14.65% | 7.44% | 13.91% | 16.48% | -13.13% | 24.76% | 13.46% | 25.19% | -10.34% | 15.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPM and SPMD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between GRPM and SPMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPM vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
GRPM
SPMD
GRPM vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRPM | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.85 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 10.44 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRPM vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPM | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -57.62% | +14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -8.86% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -24.08% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -24.08% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | -41.86% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -1.13% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -8.10% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.41% | +0.19% |
Volatility
GRPM vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) is 3.73%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that GRPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPM | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.72% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 11.79% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 15.90% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 19.72% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 21.19% | +1.03% |
GRPM vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRPM vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPM and SPMD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMD has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to GRPM (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 10-year performance, SPMD leads with 11.86% vs 11.23% for GRPM. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMD has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.75% for GRPM.
GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.03% for SPMD.
SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPM and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer