GRPM vs. SOXQ
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GRPM returned 15.72%/yr vs 59.09%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 92.48% return.
GRPM
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 8.28%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 92.48%
- 6M
- 89.00%
- 1Y
- 171.59%
- 3Y*
- 59.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 8.28% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 2.36% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 92.48% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPM and SOXQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GRPM and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRPM
SOXQ
Financial Services
Technology
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
GRPM
SOXQ
Technology
GRPM
SOXQ
Energy
GRPM
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
GRPM
SOXQ
-
Industrials
GRPM
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
GRPM
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
GRPM
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
GRPM
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
GRPM
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
GRPM
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
GRPM
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPM vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
GRPM
SOXQ
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRPM | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.69 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 11.08 | -7.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 42.47 | -33.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRPM | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 5.11 | -3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.96 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPM | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -46.01% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -15.59% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -39.36% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.15% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -12.95% | +7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 4.06% | -1.49% |
Volatility
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) is 3.77%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that GRPM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPM | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 13.55% | -9.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 26.81% | -16.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 33.80% | -17.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 36.38% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 36.38% | -14.13% |
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRPM vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.95% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPM and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to GRPM (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.09% vs 15.72% for GRPM. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.09% return vs 15.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
GRPM has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
GRPM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. GRPM tracks S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPM and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer