GRPM vs. JMEE
GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) and JMEE (JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index, while JMEE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. GRPM is passively managed, while JMEE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GRPM returned 13.73%/yr vs 14.61%/yr for JMEE. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GRPM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JMEE.
Performance
GRPM vs. JMEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRPM achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly lower than JMEE's 18.52% return.
GRPM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.48%
JMEE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 30.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43M | $1.18M | $1.33M | |
| $6.28M | $7.48M | $8.96M |
GRPM vs. JMEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 13.17% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -0.47% |
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF | 18.52% | 7.65% | 13.65% | 18.12% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRPM and JMEE is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GRPM and JMEE shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GRPM vs. JMEE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GRPM
JMEE
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
GRPM
JMEE
Technology
GRPM
JMEE
Healthcare
GRPM
JMEE
Consumer Cyclical
GRPM
JMEE
Industrials
GRPM
JMEE
Energy
GRPM
JMEE
Basic Materials
GRPM
JMEE
Consumer Defensive
GRPM
JMEE
Communication Services
GRPM
-
JMEE
Real Estate
GRPM
-
JMEE
Utilities
GRPM
-
JMEE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRPM vs. JMEE — Risk / Return Rank
GRPM
JMEE
GRPM vs. JMEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) and JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRPM | JMEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.49 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 12.21 | -4.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRPM vs. JMEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRPM drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than JMEE's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPM and JMEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRPM | JMEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -25.40% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -8.24% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -25.40% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -2.22% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -5.23% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.35% | +0.21% |
Volatility
GRPM vs. JMEE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) at 3.31%. This indicates that GRPM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRPM | JMEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.31% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 11.44% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 16.04% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 19.32% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 19.32% | +2.87% |
GRPM vs. JMEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRPM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JMEE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRPM vs. JMEE - Dividend Comparison
GRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than JMEE's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.70% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.13% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 6.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRPM and JMEE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRPM has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to JMEE (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPM dropped -43.12% vs JMEE's -25.40%.
On 3-year performance, JMEE leads with 14.61% vs 13.73% for GRPM. On fees, JMEE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMEE has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JMEE has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMEE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
JMEE has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.70% for GRPM.
GRPM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JMEE is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPM and 0.24% for JMEE.
JMEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRPM and JMEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer