PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GROY vs. AP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GROY vs. AP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GROY achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than AP's 50.84% return.


GROY

1D
-3.35%
1M
-9.09%
6M
-39.25%
YTD
-35.64%
1Y
-2.99%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
-11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-9.27%

AP

1D
-3.37%
1M
9.39%
6M
44.34%
YTD
50.84%
1Y
159.35%
3Y*
27.82%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
-3.65%
ALL TIME*
-0.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$974.40K$1.44M$1.89M
$5.32M$4.90M$5.56M

GROY vs. AP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
-35.64%233.88%-17.69%-36.27%-51.98%9.33%
AP
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
50.84%155.02%-23.44%8.76%-49.80%-32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GROY and AP is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.16

The correlation between GROY and AP shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GROY:

$491.25M

AP:

$163.42M

EPS

GROY:

-$0.01

AP:

-$3.36

PS Ratio

GROY:

28.07

AP:

0.38

PB Ratio

GROY:

0.87

AP:

5.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

GROY:

$19.65M

AP:

$433.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GROY:

$14.42M

AP:

$53.11M

EBITDA (TTM)

GROY:

$9.22M

AP:

$20.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GROY vs. AP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GROY
GROY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GROY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GROY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GROY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GROY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GROY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AP
AP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GROY vs. AP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GROYAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.27

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

3.20

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

6.62

-6.58

GROY vs. AP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GROY Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the AP Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GROY and AP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GROY vs. AP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GROY drawdown since its inception was -82.01%, smaller than the maximum AP drawdown of -98.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GROY and AP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GROYAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.01%

-98.06%

+16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.63%

-46.84%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.63%

-80.67%

+29.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.45%

-88.58%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.02%

-79.19%

+19.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.87%

-52.31%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.02%

22.57%

+3.45%

Volatility

GROY vs. AP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) is 11.00%, while Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a volatility of 23.64%. This indicates that GROY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GROYAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

23.64%

-12.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.11%

67.11%

-30.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.46%

86.93%

-31.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.52%

75.59%

-19.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.86%

73.02%

-13.16%

Dividends

GROY vs. AP - Dividend Comparison

Neither GROY nor AP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AP
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.45%2.69%7.02%
GROY
Gold Royalty Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.36%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GROY vs. AP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Royalty Corp. and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GROY vs. AP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Royalty Corp. and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GROY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported a gross profit of 5.48M and revenue of 7.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

AP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 103.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GROY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported an operating income of 2.64M and revenue of 7.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.

AP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56M and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

GROY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported a net income of 1.77M and revenue of 7.18M, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.

AP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of -867.00K and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GROY and AP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AP has higher volatility (23.64%) compared to GROY (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GROY dropped -82.01% vs AP's -98.06%.

AP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GROY and AP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer