GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO
GRO.TO (Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GRO.TO returned 23.55% vs 23.44% for XGRO.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GRO.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.
Performance
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRO.TO achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return.
GRO.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 23.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRO.TO Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio | 8.77% | 11.09% | 15.17% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.38% | 15.59% | 9.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRO.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GRO.TO
XGRO.TO
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio (GRO.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRO.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.54 | 1.41 | +2.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.30 | +0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.41 | 14.67 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRO.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 2.18 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.35 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.96%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRO.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRO.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.96% | -47.97% | +35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -7.12% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.18% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -8.49% | +7.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.60% | -0.38% |
Volatility
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio (GRO.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRO.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.43% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | 9.19% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 10.78% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 11.05% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 12.26% | -0.37% |
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRO.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GRO.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
GRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRO.TO Franklin Growth ETF Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.76% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRO.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for GRO.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for GRO.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for GRO.TO and XGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer