PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRN vs. VXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRN vs. VXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRN achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than VXX's -11.22% return.


GRN

1D
-2.02%
1M
2.13%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-7.22%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
-1.57%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*

VXX

1D
-3.33%
1M
-18.15%
YTD
-11.22%
6M
-24.41%
1Y
-54.83%
3Y*
-42.32%
5Y*
-46.46%
10Y*
-46.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRN vs. VXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GRN
iPath Series B Carbon ETN
-10.45%20.33%-7.34%-2.99%-0.07%147.21%30.47%-8.41%
VXX
iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN
-11.22%-42.21%-26.22%-72.52%-23.80%-72.41%11.04%-38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GRN and VXX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRN vs. VXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRN
GRN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VXX
VXX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRN vs. VXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRNVXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.81

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.96

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

-1.37

+1.97

GRN vs. VXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the VXX Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRN and VXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRNVXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

-0.99

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.69

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.77

+1.17

Drawdowns

GRN vs. VXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRN drawdown since its inception was -47.96%, smaller than the maximum VXX drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRN and VXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNVXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.96%

-100.00%

+52.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.39%

-57.39%

+27.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.30%

-79.68%

+34.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.96%

-95.79%

+47.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.35%

-100.00%

+78.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.54%

-95.08%

+77.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.87%

40.04%

-28.17%

Volatility

GRN vs. VXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iPath Series B Carbon ETN (GRN) is 5.88%, while iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that GRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNVXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

8.62%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.53%

40.99%

-16.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.73%

55.62%

-27.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.83%

67.94%

-28.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.94%

70.95%

-29.01%

GRN vs. VXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VXX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRN vs. VXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRN nor VXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GRN and VXX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to GRN (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRN dropped -47.96% vs VXX's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, GRN leads with 9.08% vs -46.46% for VXX. On fees, GRN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GRN has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRN has performed better with a 9.08% return vs -46.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for VXX.

GRN and VXX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GRN is categorized as Commodities, while VXX is Volatility. GRN tracks Barclays Global Carbon II Index, while VXX tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRN and 0.89% for VXX.

GRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRN and VXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer