GRGD.TO vs. LULU
GRGD.TO (Groupe Dynamite Inc) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past year, GRGD.TO returned 397.05% vs -64.80% for LULU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRGD.TO is traded in CAD, while LULU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LULU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRGD.TO achieves a -6.57% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -44.17% return.
GRGD.TO
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -16.51%
- YTD
- -6.57%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 397.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LULU
- 1D
- -8.37%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -44.17%
- 6M
- -39.35%
- 1Y
- -64.80%
- 3Y*
- -30.64%
- 5Y*
- -16.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRGD.TO Groupe Dynamite Inc | -6.57% | 337.35% | -2.02% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -44.17% | -48.15% | 24.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRGD.TO and LULU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
GRGD.TO:
CA$3.31
LULU:
$12.35
GRGD.TO:
23.31
LULU:
9.25
GRGD.TO:
0.68
LULU:
0.45
GRGD.TO:
4.49
LULU:
1.21
GRGD.TO:
CA$1.31B
LULU:
$11.20B
GRGD.TO:
CA$836.52M
LULU:
$6.24B
GRGD.TO:
CA$476.39M
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRGD.TO vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
GRGD.TO
LULU
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Groupe Dynamite Inc (GRGD.TO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 0.69 | +1.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.54 | -1.16 | +12.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.25 | -1.96 | +37.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.48 | -1.36 | +7.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.53 | 0.50 | +2.03 |
Drawdowns
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.88%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRGD.TO and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.88% | -76.74% | +26.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.00% | -56.15% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.74% | -76.74% | +56.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -18.51% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.11% | 45.46% | -34.35% |
Volatility
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Groupe Dynamite Inc (GRGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.42% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 12.90%. This indicates that GRGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.42% | 12.90% | +4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.29% | 32.48% | +10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.55% | 47.80% | +12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 41.17% | +17.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.88% | 39.72% | +19.16% |
Dividends
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
GRGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GRGD.TO Groupe Dynamite Inc | 2.98% | 2.78% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Groupe Dynamite Inc and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
GRGD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported a gross profit of 248.29M and revenue of 394.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
GRGD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported an operating income of 116.62M and revenue of 394.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GRGD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported a net income of 79.45M and revenue of 394.18M, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRGD.TO and LULU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRGD.TO and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer