GRGD.TO vs. LULU
GRGD.TO (Groupe Dynamite Inc) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past year, GRGD.TO returned 69.72% vs -48.18% for LULU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRGD.TO is traded in CAD, while LULU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LULU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GRGD.TO having a -41.38% return and LULU slightly lower at -42.53%.
GRGD.TO
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- 6M
- -33.28%
- YTD
- -41.38%
- 1Y
- 69.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 68.89%
LULU
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- -41.66%
- YTD
- -42.53%
- 1Y
- -48.18%
- 3Y*
- -31.30%
- 5Y*
- -19.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.13%
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRGD.TO Groupe Dynamite Inc | -41.38% | 337.35% | -6.94% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.53% | -48.14% | 27.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRGD.TO and LULU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
GRGD.TO:
CA$5.26B
LULU:
$13.25B
GRGD.TO:
CA$2.42
LULU:
$12.35
GRGD.TO:
20.03
LULU:
9.45
GRGD.TO:
0.58
LULU:
0.46
GRGD.TO:
3.97
LULU:
1.23
GRGD.TO:
97.04
LULU:
2.68
GRGD.TO:
CA$1.39B
LULU:
$11.20B
GRGD.TO:
CA$877.86M
LULU:
$6.24B
GRGD.TO:
CA$490.24M
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRGD.TO vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
GRGD.TO
LULU
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Groupe Dynamite Inc (GRGD.TO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.81 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | -0.94 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | -1.74 | +5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.06%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -89.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRGD.TO and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.06% | -89.80% | +36.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.06% | -51.22% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -78.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.27% | -76.14% | +25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -24.83% | +9.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.07% | 29.44% | -10.37% |
Volatility
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Groupe Dynamite Inc (GRGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.91% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 11.37%. This indicates that GRGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRGD.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.91% | 11.37% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.30% | 32.39% | +30.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.14% | 45.19% | +23.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 42.77% | +22.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 41.30% | +24.28% |
Dividends
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
GRGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GRGD.TO Groupe Dynamite Inc | 4.75% | 2.78% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Groupe Dynamite Inc and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRGD.TO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
GRGD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported a gross profit of 182.05M and revenue of 310.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
GRGD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported an operating income of 79.83M and revenue of 310.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.7%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
GRGD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Groupe Dynamite Inc reported a net income of 51.68M and revenue of 310.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRGD.TO and LULU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRGD.TO and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer