PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GREK vs. AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GREK vs. AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GREK achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.


GREK

1D
0.87%
1M
5.63%
YTD
15.45%
6M
15.54%
1Y
38.63%
3Y*
32.67%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
16.01%

AS

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-7.56%
1Y
-5.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GREK vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
15.45%76.11%4.16%
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
-5.06%33.58%108.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GREK and AS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GREK vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GREK
GREK Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GREK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GREK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GREK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GREK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GREK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AS
AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GREK vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GREKASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.01

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

-0.18

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

-0.36

+5.98

GREK vs. AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GREK Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the AS Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GREK and AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GREK vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GREK drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GREK and AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GREKASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.50%

-40.71%

-38.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.32%

-28.78%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-15.49%

+14.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.25%

-13.29%

-31.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

14.56%

-7.66%

Volatility

GREK vs. AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) is 8.69%, while Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that GREK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GREKASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

10.17%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.65%

29.10%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.35%

41.31%

-16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.44%

49.55%

-25.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.71%

49.55%

-19.84%

Dividends

GREK vs. AS - Dividend Comparison

GREK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AS
Amer Sports, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GREK
Global X MSCI Greece ETF
3.00%3.46%4.63%2.61%2.82%2.16%2.62%2.25%2.41%2.13%1.95%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GREK and AS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AS has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to GREK (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GREK dropped -79.50% vs AS's -40.71%.

GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GREK and AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer